www.AjayOnLine.us Mobile.0091 94184 50899 Email smile.asharma@gmail.com
An Interrview with Ajay Sharma NEWTON ,EINTSEIN & ARCHIMEDES updated or generalized
INTERVIEW ON Utube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ig414VSGiw&feature=youtu.be
English script of INTERVIEW 22 Q&A
https://www.academia.edu/19628856/Newton_Einstein_and_Archimedes_Laws_update_or_generalized_Interview
HINDI script of INTERVIEW
https://www.academia.edu/19644705/Update_of_Newton_Einstein_and_Archimedes_in_Hindi_
Over dozen simple artices are avaiable at academia website Link below. Forex
https://independent.academia.edu/ajaysharma57
^{Link to popular articles on IBNLIVE website} ^{http://khabar.ibnlive.com/news/desh/scientistajaysharmachallengeeinsteinnewtonarchimedesclaim386472.html#vuukle_div}
http://khabar.ibnlive.com/blogs/ajaysharama/archimedesprincipleajaysharma410796.htm
^{Books https://www.academia.edu/19644705/Update_of_Newton_Einstein_and_Archimedes_in_Hindi_}
Beyond Einstein and E=mc^{2} pp. 546 Chapters 7 Publisher: Cambridge International Science Publishing , Cambridge England, 2015 http://www.amazon.co.uk/BeyondEinsteinmc2AjaySharma/dp/1907343318/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1424329075&sr=81&keywords=beyond+einstein+and+e+mc2 Burn the candle of ‘doubt’ to get scientific light. Should scientists be regarded as greater than almighty GOD ? http://www.amazon.com/BeyondEinsteinmc2AjaySharma/dp/1907343318
Beyond Newton and Archimedes pp. 334 Chapters 10 Publisher: Cambridge International Science Publishing, Cambridge England, Oct. 2014 The spiritualism becomes science if testable. Science becomes superstition if untestable.
http://www.amazon.com/BeyondNewtonArchimedesAjaySharma/dp/1907343938 Some scientific papers (i) Dear Professor Mamedov:  cos0= 1 you have taken cos0 =0 (check basic BOOKS of Physics and Mathematics). Then comment on reserach paper. Further ...you cannot use values of cos0 =1 and cos0=0 in the same equation. Generalization of E=mc^{2} to 'delta'E = A c^{2} 'delta'M Link https://independent.academia.edu/ajaysharma57/Papers (ii) Professor R Srinivasan Editor (Indian Institute of science,Banglore) CURRENT SCIENCE, give report of ADJUDICATOR , to whom sent paper ( Ref. 4884 SC, 19 Oct. 2013.) on 5 Dec. 2013. HOW do you justify that FIRST equation is ZERO and FINAL equation is E_{rme}=M_{rme}c^{2 }in Einstein's 1907 paper? Can there be OUTPUT without INPUT? Einstein is absoluetely wrong here. Give answers? Link https://independent.academia.edu/ajaysharma57/Papers
(iii) Isaac Newton Did Not Discover Second Law of Motion In Principia (1687,1713,1726) Newton never gave F =ma , but Swiss Leonhard Euler gave F=ma in 1775 (paper available at Mathematical Association of America Webisite) In Newton's time ACCELERATION and second derivatives were not defined. So it was impossible for Newton to give F=ma. These facts are in history of science and Math. See Link in SCIE internationally recognised Journal of Ajay Sharma's innovative paper
https://www.academia.edu/8302996/Isaac_Newton_Leonhard_Euler_and_F_ma POWER POINT PRESENTATION SLIDES "No to Newton for discovery of F=ma, Yeah to Euler" 41 Slides Download https://independent.academia.edu/ajaysharma57/Papers Swiss scientist Leonhard Euler stated F = ma in1775. The paper can be found at http://eulerarchive.maa.org/ Paper No. E479 page 223 (ii) Amazing facts about Deviation of E=mc^{2 } ^{Einstein's 5 papers in were published in 1905 in Annalen Der Physik WITHOUT PEER REVIEW. Einstein FULLY MIUSED Galileo's Principle of Relativity ( given in 1632 Dialogue Concerning Two New Chief World Systems ) in his June 1905 paper known as Special Theory of Relativity. It is unfair play by Einstein. You may check records. Einstein also used existing concepts,Constancy of Speed of Light given by Poincaire (1898 ) relativistic varation of mass given by Lorentz (1892) Time Dilation given by Larmor (1897) and length contraction given by FitzGerald} (1889).Einstein's paper was published ^{UNREVIEWEDmeans UNCHECKED,well after the discoveries in 1905 as his own. Einstein did not ACKWOLEDGE work of Galileo,Poincare, Larmor, Lorentz ,FirzGerald and others , did not give any REFERENCE in his UNREVIEWED paper published in June 1905 , known as Special Theory of Relativity.} Einstein’s September 1905 derivation of E=mc^{2} is a speculation, under special conditions. Initially Einstein derived L =mc^{2} (light energy mass equation) is true under SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Under general conditions Einstein’ derivation predicts “When light energy is emitted , mass of body must increase” Thus WITHOUT logic or mathematical basis Einstein SPECULATED E=mc^{2} Einstein all important derivation was published in UNREVIEWED journal. Ajay Sharma’s paper published in SCIE journal (PEER REVIEWED) is available at
https://www.academia.edu/8409186/Is_E_%CE%94mc_2_mathematically_derived_or_speculated_in_Einsteins_September_1905_paper
(iii) Noble Lecture is not end of scientific exploration but beginning . In 1932, Sir Cockcroft and Walton disintegrated Lithium7 to alpha particles, without any comments on E=mc^{2}. In 1945 atom bombs were exploded on Japan. It triggered hype of E=mc^{2} in scientific arena. On 11 December 1951 while receiving Noble Prize in Nobel Lecture said (at page 171 lines 13 ) http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1951/cockcroftlecture.pdf
Sir Cockcroft stated that in their 1932 experiment E=mc^{2} was closely confirmed. But is not true. The critical analysis of experiment of Sir Cockcroft implies that the deviations from E=mc^{2} (a) was 16.59% in 1932. (b) is 9.768 % and if current values of lituim7 , alpha particles and proton are considered then deviation. Thus such experiments to be repeated for final conclusions. Ajay Sharma’s paper published in SCIE journal (PEER REVIEWED) is available at https://www.academia.edu/8618363/Did_the_CockcroftWalton_experiment_really_confirm_Einsteins_E_mc2_first_of_all
Recognisitions
International Conferences more than 90. Presented papers twice in USA (2007, 2014) and England (April 2005 September 2005) Germany 2002 Forth coming: Moscow, Russia, 29June2July, Macau, China 36August 2015 Publications. Over 55, some of them published in SCI journals.
Beyond Einstein and E=mc^{2} pp.546, Chapters 7 Publisher, Cambridge International Science Publisher, Cambridge, England) http://www.amazon.com/BeyondEinsteinmc2AjaySharma/dp/1907343318
Brief description (i) Einstein’s 1905 paper of Theory of Relativity was published in Annalen der Physik without any peer review by experts. So whatever Einstein wrote was published. Einstein took this opportunity to publish work of Galileo (1632), Poincare (1898), Lorentz (1892 ) , time dilation Larmer (1897 ) ,length contraction Fitzegerald (1889 ) etc. Einstein scored goals without goalkeeper in playground. So the theory of relativity is not Einstein’s. In scientific language it is called plagiarism and in general sense THEFT in broad day daylight. Einstein called work of Galileo and Poincare as postulates or hypothesis ….. but these are accepted realities in the literature. (ii) Einstein’s derivation which leads to E=mc^{2} , also implies that WHEN A CANDLE BURNS ITS MASS MUST INCREASE. It is the biggest contradiction in science. Thus equation is derived in alternate way as dE=Ac^{2}dm . Thus generalized equation is general equation and E=mc^{2} is its special case. A can be less, more or equal to unity. (iii) In 1907 Einstein had also derived rest mass energy E(rme)=Mc^{2} . It is derived under condition when FIRST equation is zero, and last equation is E(rme)=Mc^{2}. Thus we get OUTPUT without INPUT. It can be understood in analogous way as ……ground floor of the 10 storeyed building is demolished. Then according to Einstein’s logic, the remaining 9 storeyed building will FLOAT in air. Thus Einstein’s deduction is BASELESS. (vi) When velocity of body or particle becomes comparable to that of light, then its mass increases. Then its heavier mass (or actual mass) must be taken in account. However in nuclear chain reaction the velocity of neutrons is in relativistic region, so its mass must increase. But mass is taken as original mass. It is not justifies. Also E =mc^{2} cannot explain simultaneously the MASS DEFECT and BINDING ENERGY of deuteron. The generalized equation ∆E =Ac^{2}∆m can explain. (v) An alternate Theory of Earliest Formation of Universe is developed that universe started its life from ZEROANS (waves or particle of zero masses). The gravitational energy is another form of mass. This theory contradicts none of existing theories. (vi) It is justified that, Newton did not give Second Law of Motion, F=ma but given by Swiss Leonhard Euler in 1775. Thus the existing literature has to be revised. Further it is confirmed that Action and Reaction are always equal and opposite. Chapters 1. Einstein derived DL =Dmc^{2} For Newton’s Perception; and its historical aspects. 2. Contradictions In Einstein’s Derivation Of ∆L=∆mc^{2 } 3. Derivation Of Generalized Form Of Mass Energy Equation, ∆E =Ac^{2}∆m 4. Applications Of Equation ∆E =Ac^{2}∆m In Understanding The Origin Of Universe. 5. Applications of generalized mass energy interconversion equation in Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Reactors 6. Rest Mass Energy E_{rme} = M_{rme}c^{2} Is Derived From Non Existent Equation. 7.Frequently Asked Questions : Based on previous chapters
www.AjayOnLine.us 094184 50899
(i) GOOD MORNING Newton : Who gifted you 2nd law of motion, F=ma http://www.gsjournal.net/ScienceJournals/CommunicationsMechanics%20/%20Electrodynamics/Download/5515 The links to Newton’s the Principia, BOOK I, 1687 is below ( see page 19). http://books.google.co.in/books?id=Tm0FAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA1&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
(ii) GOOD MORNING Archimedes Generalization of 2265 years old Archimedes principle as it does not account for the SHAPE of body.
Chapters of ‘Beyond Newton and Archimedes 1. 2360 Years Old Aristotle's Assertion Revalidated by Stokes Law 2. Construction of Water, Glycerine and Ethyl Alcohol Barometers 3. Archimedes Principle: The Oldest Established Law 4. The Generalized Form of Archimedes Principle 5. Prediction of Indeterminate Form Of Volume From 6. Archimedes Principle Is Stokes Law Applicable for Rising Bodies? 7. Limitation of Existing Theories and an Alternate Theory of Rising, Falling and Floating Bodies 8. Route to Newton's Laws of Motion 9. Experimental Confirmations of Equations of Conservation Laws in Elastic Collisions 10. Elastic Collisions in One Dimension and Newton's Third Law of Motion
MOBILE 0091 94184 50899 ,(Res.) 0091 177 2804546
Number of visitors since Jan. 2007
